(0) Obligation:
Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:
minus(x, 0) → x
minus(s(x), s(y)) → minus(x, y)
quot(0, s(y)) → 0
quot(s(x), s(y)) → s(quot(minus(x, y), s(y)))
plus(0, y) → y
plus(s(x), y) → s(plus(x, y))
plus(minus(x, s(0)), minus(y, s(s(z)))) → plus(minus(y, s(s(z))), minus(x, s(0)))
Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST
(1) CpxTrsToCdtProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Converted CpxTRS to CDT
(2) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))
plus(0, z0) → z0
plus(s(z0), z1) → s(plus(z0, z1))
plus(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → plus(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0)))
Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(PLUS(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0))), MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
S tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(PLUS(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0))), MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:
minus, quot, plus
Defined Pair Symbols:
MINUS, QUOT, PLUS
Compound Symbols:
c1, c3, c5, c6
(3) CdtRhsSimplificationProcessorProof (BOTH BOUNDS(ID, ID) transformation)
Removed 1 trailing tuple parts
(4) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))
plus(0, z0) → z0
plus(s(z0), z1) → s(plus(z0, z1))
plus(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → plus(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0)))
Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
S tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
K tuples:none
Defined Rule Symbols:
minus, quot, plus
Defined Pair Symbols:
MINUS, QUOT, PLUS
Compound Symbols:
c1, c3, c5, c6
(5) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)
Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
And the Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :
POL(0) = [3]
POL(MINUS(x1, x2)) = 0
POL(PLUS(x1, x2)) = [4] + [2]x1 + [2]x2
POL(QUOT(x1, x2)) = 0
POL(c1(x1)) = x1
POL(c3(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(c5(x1)) = x1
POL(c6(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(minus(x1, x2)) = [2] + [2]x1 + [3]x2
POL(s(x1)) = [5] + x1
(6) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))
plus(0, z0) → z0
plus(s(z0), z1) → s(plus(z0, z1))
plus(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → plus(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0)))
Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
S tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
K tuples:
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
Defined Rule Symbols:
minus, quot, plus
Defined Pair Symbols:
MINUS, QUOT, PLUS
Compound Symbols:
c1, c3, c5, c6
(7) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^1))) transformation)
Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
And the Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :
POL(0) = [2]
POL(MINUS(x1, x2)) = [4]
POL(PLUS(x1, x2)) = [4] + [2]x2
POL(QUOT(x1, x2)) = [4]x1
POL(c1(x1)) = x1
POL(c3(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(c5(x1)) = x1
POL(c6(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(minus(x1, x2)) = [2] + x1
POL(s(x1)) = [4] + x1
(8) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))
plus(0, z0) → z0
plus(s(z0), z1) → s(plus(z0, z1))
plus(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → plus(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0)))
Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
S tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
K tuples:
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
Defined Rule Symbols:
minus, quot, plus
Defined Pair Symbols:
MINUS, QUOT, PLUS
Compound Symbols:
c1, c3, c5, c6
(9) CdtPolyRedPairProof (UPPER BOUND (ADD(O(n^2))) transformation)
Found a reduction pair which oriented the following tuples strictly. Hence they can be removed from S.
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
We considered the (Usable) Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
And the Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
The order we found is given by the following interpretation:
Polynomial interpretation :
POL(0) = 0
POL(MINUS(x1, x2)) = [1] + [2]x1
POL(PLUS(x1, x2)) = [2] + [3]x1 + [3]x2
POL(QUOT(x1, x2)) = [2]x12
POL(c1(x1)) = x1
POL(c3(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(c5(x1)) = x1
POL(c6(x1, x2)) = x1 + x2
POL(minus(x1, x2)) = x1
POL(s(x1)) = [2] + x1
(10) Obligation:
Complexity Dependency Tuples Problem
Rules:
minus(z0, 0) → z0
minus(s(z0), s(z1)) → minus(z0, z1)
quot(0, s(z0)) → 0
quot(s(z0), s(z1)) → s(quot(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)))
plus(0, z0) → z0
plus(s(z0), z1) → s(plus(z0, z1))
plus(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → plus(minus(z1, s(s(z2))), minus(z0, s(0)))
Tuples:
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
S tuples:none
K tuples:
PLUS(s(z0), z1) → c5(PLUS(z0, z1))
PLUS(minus(z0, s(0)), minus(z1, s(s(z2)))) → c6(MINUS(z1, s(s(z2))), MINUS(z0, s(0)))
QUOT(s(z0), s(z1)) → c3(QUOT(minus(z0, z1), s(z1)), MINUS(z0, z1))
MINUS(s(z0), s(z1)) → c1(MINUS(z0, z1))
Defined Rule Symbols:
minus, quot, plus
Defined Pair Symbols:
MINUS, QUOT, PLUS
Compound Symbols:
c1, c3, c5, c6
(11) SIsEmptyProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The set S is empty
(12) BOUNDS(O(1), O(1))